The PMI identifies several tools that are essential to effective project management. One tool is the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). How valuable is the WBS in the real-world of time constrained project management?
I believe the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is one of the most important tools PMI has established as being essential for Project Managers to complete projects successfully.
The WBS is critical because it furnishes the substructure for defining work related to the objective(s) of a project. In addition to defining the work it also provides a core in which to manage the finalization of project work (Project Management Institute, 2006, p.1).
The PMI et al. (2006, p.1) states the WBS is used in projects to:
- "Define the projects scope of work in terms of deliverables and to future decompose these deliverables into components."
- It provides "the project management team with a framework on which to base project status and progress reports."
- "Facilitate communication between the project manager and stakeholders throughout the life of the project."
- Be "a key input to other project management processes and deliverables."
I believe any project be it a kitchen remodeling, a wedding, deploying a new computer network, or the Navy building a new nuclear submarine must use the WBS in some form or other. The more complicated the project the more important a WBS becomes.
I have used elementary forms of a WBS at various times during my career but I did not realize it until a few years ago. In the past, I called them business plans, and they exhibited some of the characteristics I have mentioned above. After reading Chapter 11 in the Project Management book by Kerzner (2003) I now realize we were lucky to every successful complete a project.
An example of a project I was involved with was to decrease the time it took for us to complete a transaction. We also wanted to reduce our cost for each transaction. Our primary goal was to be able to conduct more business (make more money) while reducing our per transaction cost. We implemented our plan and dealt with internal and external factors as they arose. Training was easy and risk was never really an issue. Defining the scope, creating a framework, communication with stakeholders, and using this project as an input for other projects was never formally practiced. We might have used our experiences on that project for future ones but not at a proper level. This particular project was very successful but only because of pure knowledge and will power of the people involved and not due to a proper WBS. Since that time, I create a WBS for every project I take on whether it be putting up a new fence in my yard or becoming the project manager for the creation of an analytics model.
Reference:
Kerzner, H. (2003) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken: NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2006). Practice Standard for Work Breakdown Structures (2nd ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.